Sample Campus — Building B

Categories, worst first · Month to date · day 19 of 31

• Contracts25 / 80 ptsCritical31.3%10% of the scoreBuyout Percent Completion scored 0 of 20 pts; a deduction took off 15 pts›
  CategoryClose

  Contracts

  25 / 80 pts31.3%earned / possible

  Critical· 5 are below standard· −6.88 of 10 pts on the total

  10% of the score · 6 of 7 rules scored

  The trend appears once two months are sealed.

  What’s costing points

  1. Buyout Percent Completion−20 of 20 pts

     71%, expected 95% by month 7 — costs 20 of 20 pts.

  2. Change Event to PCCO over 2 days−15 pts

     Deducted 15 pts.

  3. Commitment CO Avg. Turnaround−10 of 20 pts

     15 days, expected 10 days or less — costs 10 of 20 pts.

  4. Commitments Open Over 30 Days−5 of 10 pts

     1 of 20 commitments open past 30 days (5%), expected 3% or less — costs 5 of 10 pts.

  5. Prime Contract CO Avg. Turnaround−5 of 20 pts

     40 days, expected under 30 days — costs 5 of 20 pts.

  Every rule

  What the company expects, what happened, and how it reads. Worst first. Open a rule for the arithmetic and the records behind it.

  RuleExpectedActualStandingPts

  • Buyout Percent CompletionunconfirmedAutomaticexpected 95% by month 7actual 71%71%, expected 95% by month 7Criticalpoints 0 / 20
  • Commitments Open Over 30 DaysunconfirmedAutomaticexpected 3% or lessactual 1 of 20 commitments open past 30 days (5%)1 of 20 commitments open past 30 days (5%), expected 3% or lessBelow standardpoints 5 / 10
  • Commitment CO Avg. TurnaroundunconfirmedAutomaticexpected 10 days or lessactual 15 days15 days, expected 10 days or lessBelow standardpoints 10 / 20
  • Prime Contract CO Avg. TurnaroundunconfirmedAutomaticexpected under 30 daysactual 40 days40 days, expected under 30 daysBelow standardpoints 15 / 20
  • Change Event to PCCO over 2 daysunconfirmedEntered by handexpected No deductionactual Deducted1 change event that took over 2 days to reach a PCCODeducted, expected No deduction — 1 change event that took over 2 days to reach a PCCOBelow standardpoints −15
  • On-Site Sub ComplianceunconfirmedEntered by handexpected 90% or moreactual —expected 90% or moreWaiting on an entrypoints —

    No verified figure for this month — a hand-entered figure scores only after it is verified, by a second person whenever the company has one.

    Who enters it: Assistant Project Manager (Assistant Project Manager)

  • Commitment Avg. TurnaroundunconfirmedAutomaticexpected 25 days or lessactual 25 days25 days, expected 25 days or lessMeeting standardpoints 10 / 10
• Schedule78 / 100 ptsBelow standard78%20% of the scoreSchedule Quality & Baseline Comparison scored 78 of 100 pts›
  CategoryClose

  Schedule

  78 / 100 pts78%earned / possible

  Below standard· 1 is below standard· −4.4 of 20 pts on the total

  20% of the score · 1 of 1 rule scored

  The trend appears once two months are sealed.

  What’s costing points

  1. Schedule Quality & Baseline Comparison−22 of 100 pts

     78 pts, expected 100 pts — costs 22 of 100 pts.

  Every rule

  What the company expects, what happened, and how it reads. Worst first. Open a rule for the arithmetic and the records behind it.

  RuleExpectedActualStandingPts

  • Schedule Quality & Baseline ComparisonunconfirmedEntered by handexpected 100 ptsactual 78 pts78 pts, expected 100 ptsBelow standardpoints 78 / 100
• Financials90 / 100 ptsBelow standard90%20% of the scoreGross Profit Fade and 1 more are below standard›
  CategoryClose

  Financials

  90 / 100 pts90%earned / possible

  Below standard· 2 are below standard· −2 of 20 pts on the total

  20% of the score · 11 of 11 rules scored

  The trend appears once two months are sealed.

  What’s costing points

  1. Gross Profit Fade−10 of 20 pts

     1, expected under 1 — costs 10 of 20 pts.

  2. Outstanding Sub Invoice Approvals−10 pts

     Deducted 10 pts.

  Every rule

  What the company expects, what happened, and how it reads. Worst first. Open a rule for the arithmetic and the records behind it.

  RuleExpectedActualStandingPts

  • Gross Profit FadeunconfirmedEntered by handReported gp fade assessment valueexpected under 1actual 11, expected under 1Below standardpoints 10 / 20
  • Outstanding Sub Invoice ApprovalsEntered by handexpected No deductionactual Deducted1 sub invoice left unapprovedDeducted, expected No deduction — 1 sub invoice left unapprovedBelow standardpoints −10
  • Gross Profit Fade — 3rd consecutive monthunconfirmedEntered by handexpected No deductionactual —expected No deductionScored with nothing enteredpoints —

    No verified figure for this month — a hand-entered figure scores only after it is verified, by a second person whenever the company has one.

    Who enters it: Project Executive (Project Executive)

  • Underbilled PositionunconfirmedEntered by handexpected Reported yesactual YesYes, expected Reported yesMeeting standardpoints 15 / 15
  • Outstanding Accounts ReceivableunconfirmedEntered by handexpected under 31 daysactual 12 days12 days, expected under 31 daysMeeting standardpoints 10 / 10
  • Monthly Cost ForecastEntered by handexpected Reported yesactual YesYes, expected Reported yesMeeting standardpoints 10 / 10
  • Monthly Budget SnapshotAutomaticexpected On recordactual YesYes, expected On recordMeeting standardpoints 5 / 5
  • Gross Profit LossunconfirmedEntered by handexpected Reported yesactual YesYes, expected Reported yesMeeting standardpoints 15 / 15
  • Profit % at Riskexpected Awarded to every jobactual AwardedAwarded, expected Awarded to every jobMeeting standardpoints 15 / 15

    Flat award

  • Labor Costs vs. Schedule CompletionunconfirmedEntered by handexpected under 5%actual 3%3%, expected under 5%Meeting standardpoints 10 / 10
  • Write-Up OpportunityEntered by handexpected Bonus availableactual Earned1 forecast write-up recordedEarned, expected Bonus available — 1 forecast write-up recordedAbove standardpoints +10
• Safety93 / 100 ptsBelow standard93%20% of the scoreCrew Work Plans / JHAs and 1 more are below standard›
  CategoryClose

  Safety

  93 / 100 pts93%earned / possible

  Below standard· 2 are below standard· −1.4 of 20 pts on the total

  20% of the score · 9 of 9 rules scored

  The trend appears once two months are sealed.

  What’s costing points

  1. Crew Work Plans / JHAs−5 of 15 pts

     17 of 20 crew-days covered (85%), expected 90% or more — costs 5 of 15 pts.

  2. Last Safety Report Score−2 of 10 pts

     87%, expected 90% or more — costs 2 of 10 pts.

  Every rule

  What the company expects, what happened, and how it reads. Worst first. Open a rule for the arithmetic and the records behind it.

  RuleExpectedActualStandingPts

  • Crew Work Plans / JHAsunconfirmedAutomaticexpected 90% or moreactual 17 of 20 crew-days covered (85%)17 of 20 crew-days covered (85%), expected 90% or moreBelow standardpoints 10 / 15
  • Last Safety Report ScoreunconfirmedAutomaticexpected 90% or moreactual 87%87%, expected 90% or moreBelow standardpoints 8 / 10
  • Site Specific Safety PlanAutomaticexpected On recordactual YesYes, expected On recordMeeting standardpoints 5 / 5
  • Weekly Safety MeetingsunconfirmedAutomaticexpected 100% or moreactual 3 of 3 weeks with a safety meeting held (100%)3 of 3 weeks with a safety meeting held (100%), expected 100% or moreMeeting standardpoints 20 / 20
  • Morning HuddlesAutomaticexpected under 3 work daysactual 1 work day that missed the morning huddle1 work day that missed the morning huddle, expected under 3 work daysMeeting standardpoints 10 / 10
  • Monthly Super / PM Safety WalkunconfirmedAutomaticReported safety walk valueexpected 3 or moreactual 44, expected 3 or moreMeeting standardpoints 10 / 10
  • Avg. Time to Close Safety ObservationsunconfirmedAutomaticexpected 7 days or lessactual 7 days7 days, expected 7 days or lessMeeting standardpoints 10 / 10
  • Weekly Corrective ActionsAutomaticexpected 100% or moreactual 2 of 2 weeks meeting the corrective-action bar (100%)2 of 2 weeks meeting the corrective-action bar (100%), expected 100% or moreMeeting standardpoints 10 / 10
  • Utility Locate TrackingunconfirmedAutomaticReported utility locate status valueexpected 2 or moreactual 22, expected 2 or moreMeeting standardpoints 10 / 10
• Quality100 / 100 ptsBelow standard100%20% of the scoreQuality Inspections (Checklists) scored 15 of 20 pts; a bonus added 5 pts›
  CategoryClose

  Quality

  100 / 100 pts100%earned / possible

  Below standard· 1 is below standard

  20% of the score · 7 of 7 rules scored

  The trend appears once two months are sealed.

  What’s costing points

  1. Quality Inspections (Checklists)−5 of 20 pts

     8 of 10 required inspections done (80%), expected 90% or more — costs 5 of 20 pts.

  Every rule

  What the company expects, what happened, and how it reads. Worst first. Open a rule for the arithmetic and the records behind it.

  RuleExpectedActualStandingPts

  • Quality Inspections (Checklists)Automaticexpected 90% or moreactual 8 of 10 required inspections done (80%)8 of 10 required inspections done (80%), expected 90% or moreBelow standardpoints 15 / 20
  • Site Specific Quality PlanunconfirmedAutomaticexpected On recordactual YesYes, expected On recordMeeting standardpoints 10 / 10
  • Pre-Installation Meetingsexpected 90% or moreactual 9 of 10 required subs met before their first day on site (90%)9 of 10 required subs met before their first day on site (90%), expected 90% or moreMeeting standardpoints 20 / 20
  • Avg. Time to Close Quality ObservationsunconfirmedAutomaticexpected 9 days or lessactual 6 days6 days, expected 9 days or lessMeeting standardpoints 10 / 10
  • Quality Observation CountunconfirmedAutomaticexpected 100% or moreactual 4 of 4 weeks meeting the quality-observation bar (100%)4 of 4 weeks meeting the quality-observation bar (100%), expected 100% or moreMeeting standardpoints 20 / 20
  • NPDES InspectionsunconfirmedAutomaticexpected 90% or moreactual 11 of 12 required NPDES inspections completed (91.67%)11 of 12 required NPDES inspections completed (91.67%), expected 90% or moreMeeting standardpoints 20 / 20
  • Quality Action PlansAutomaticexpected Bonus availableactual Earned1 quality action plan on recordEarned, expected Bonus available — 1 quality action plan on recordAbove standardpoints +20
• Documentation100 / 100 ptsOn standard100%10% of the scoreEvery rule is on standard›
  CategoryClose

  Documentation

  100 / 100 pts100%earned / possible

  On standard

  10% of the score · 7 of 7 rules scored

  The trend appears once two months are sealed.

  What’s costing points

  Nothing in Documentation is costing points.

  Every rule

  What the company expects, what happened, and how it reads. Worst first. Open a rule for the arithmetic and the records behind it.

  RuleExpectedActualStandingPts

  • Project Startup Checklist Action PlanunconfirmedAutomaticexpected 95% by month 7actual 96%96%, expected 95% by month 7Meeting standardpoints 15 / 15
  • RFI TurnaroundAutomaticexpected 7 days or lessactual 6 days6 days, expected 7 days or lessMeeting standardpoints 15 / 15
  • Submittal TurnaroundunconfirmedAutomaticexpected 14 days or lessactual 14 days14 days, expected 14 days or lessMeeting standardpoints 15 / 15
  • Submittals Percent CompletedAutomaticexpected 100% by month 7actual 100%100%, expected 100% by month 7Meeting standardpoints 20 / 20
  • Meeting Minutes RecordedunconfirmedAutomaticexpected On recordactual YesYes, expected On recordMeeting standardpoints 15 / 15
  • Daily Log CompletionunconfirmedAutomaticexpected 5% or lessactual 1 of 20 workdays missing a daily log (5%)1 of 20 workdays missing a daily log (5%), expected 5% or lessMeeting standardpoints 20 / 20
  • Self-Perform Productivity TrackingAutomaticexpected Bonus availableactual Earned1 productivity entry loggedEarned, expected Bonus available — 1 productivity entry loggedAbove standardpoints +10